4.7 Article

Antioxidants Inhibit Formation of 3-Monochloropropane-1,2-diol Esters in Model Reactions

期刊

JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY
卷 63, 期 44, 页码 9850-9854

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.5b03503

关键词

3-MCPD esters; antioxidants; inhibition; chemical model; oil model

资金

  1. National Key Technology R&D Program of China [2014BAD04B03]
  2. National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) [2012CB720805]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangxi Province, China [20142BAB204002]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The capacities of six antioxidants to inhibit the formation of 3-monochloropropane-1,2 diol (3-MCPD) esters were examined in this study. Inhibitory capacities of the antioxidants were investigated both in chemical models containing the precursors (tripalmitoyl glycerol, 1,2-dipalmitoyl-sn-glycerol, monopalmitoyl glycerol, and sodium chloride) of 3-MCPD esters and in oil models (rapeseed oil and sodium chloride). Six antioxidants, butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT), butylated hydroxy anisole (BHA), tert-butyl hydroquinone (TBHQ), propyl gallate (PG), L-ascorbyl palmitate (AP), and alpha-tocopherol (YE), were found to exhibit inhibiting capacities on 3-MCPD ester formation both in chemical models and in oil models. TBHQ provided the highest inhibitory capacity both in chemical models and in oil models; 44% of 3-MCPD ester formation was inhibited in the presence of TBHQ(66 mg/kg of oil) after heating of rapeseed oil at 230 degrees C for 30 min, followed by PG and AP. BHT, BHA, and VE appeared to have weaker inhibitory abilities in both models. YE exhibited the lowest inhibition rate; 22% of 3-MCPD esters were inhibited in the presence of VE (172 mg/kg of oil) after heating of rapeseed oil at 230 degrees C for 30 min. In addition, the inhibition rates of PG and YE decreased dramatically with an increase in temperature or heating time. The results suggested that some antioxidants, such as TBHQ, PG, and AP, could be the potential inhibitors of 3-MCPD esters in practice.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据