4.4 Article

Association of serum interleukin-18 and other biomarkers with disease severity in adults with atopic dermatitis

期刊

ARCHIVES OF DERMATOLOGICAL RESEARCH
卷 304, 期 4, 页码 305-312

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00403-011-1198-9

关键词

Interleukin 18; Thymus and activation-regulated chemokine; Immunoglobulin E; Eosinophils; Lactate dehydrogenase; SCORingAD; Adult atopic dermatitis

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, and Technology of Japan
  2. Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare of Japan

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic inflammatory disease of the skin for which there are no reliable biomarkers to assess clinical severity. Serum interleukin-18 (IL-18) levels may be associated with AD severity. To identify putative biomarkers associated with clinical severity in adult AD patients, we enrolled 121 adult AD patients (mean age 35.7 years) and 50 healthy controls (mean age 31.7 years). We compared these groups for blood eosinophils and serum levels of IL-18, thymus and activation-regulated chemokine (TARC), total IgE, and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH). We also determined S. aureus enterotoxin B (SEB) specific IgE levels and the SCORingAD (SCORAD) scores for AD patients. For AD patients, stepwise logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios (OR) for each biomarker for the likelihood of having AD, and multiple linear regression was used to identify biomarkers associated with SCORAD scores. Compared with healthy controls, adult AD patients had higher levels of IL-18, TARC, total IgE, eosinophils, and LDH. TARC levels had the highest OR for AD occurrence, while the OR for IL-18 was insignificant. Also, IL-18 was not related to the presence of SEB-IgE. Notably, IL-18 levels were significantly associated with SCORAD scores, as were TARC, total IgE, and LDH levels. A panel of biomarkers (IL-18, TARC, total IgE, and LDH) may be more useful to accurately assess clinical severity in adult AD patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据