4.5 Article

The Cdk and PCNA domains on p21Cip1 both function to inhibit G1/S progression during hyperoxia

出版社

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/ajplung.00243.2003

关键词

cell cycle; DNA damage; proliferation; reactive oxygen species; proliferating cell nuclear antigen; cyclin-dependent kinase

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL-58774, HL-67392, HL-66988] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIEHS NIH HHS [ES-07026, ES-01247] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates molecular mechanisms underlying cell cycle arrest when cells are exposed to high levels of oxygen (hyperoxia). Hyperoxia has previously been shown to increase expression of the cell cycle regulators p53 and p21. In the current study, we found that p53-deficient human lung adenocarcinoma H1299 cells failed to induce p21 or growth arrest in G(1) when exposed to 95% oxygen. Instead, cells arrested in S and G(2). Stable expression of p53 restored induction of p21 and G(1) arrest without affecting mRNA expression of the other Cip or INK4 G(1) kinase inhibitors. To confirm the role of p21 in G(1) arrest, we created H1299 cells with tetracycline-inducible expression of enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP), EGFP fused to p21 (EGFp21), or EGFP fused to p27 (EGFp27), a related cell cycle inhibitor. The amino terminus of p21 and p27 bind cyclin-dependent kinases (Cdk), whereas the carboxy terminus of p21 binds the sliding clamp proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA). EGFp21 or EGFp27, but not EGFP by itself, restored G(1) arrest during hyperoxia. When separately overexpressed, the amino-terminal Cdk and carboxy-terminal PCNA binding domains of p21 each prevented cells from exiting G(1) during exposure. These findings demonstrate that exposure in vitro to hyperoxia exerts G(1) arrest through p53-dependent induction of p21 that suppresses Cdk and PCNA activity. Because PCNA also participates in DNA repair, these results raise the possibility that p21 also affects repair of oxidized DNA.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据