4.7 Article

Evaluation of rhubarb using antioxidative activity as an index of pharmacological usefulness

期刊

JOURNAL OF ETHNOPHARMACOLOGY
卷 91, 期 1, 页码 89-94

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jep.2003.11.021

关键词

low density lipoprotein; rhubarb; antioxidative activity; multivariate statistical analysis; HPLC

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We attempted to estimate the pharmacological activity by measuring the concentrations of a composition ingredient using a multivariate statistical analysis method. Medicinal herb of Rhubarb has been many largely unrecognized biochemical and pharmacological effect components. Therefore, we attempted to estimate the antioxidative activity of Rhubarb on low-density lipoprotein (LDL) of its components. Thirty specimens of Rhubarb from various origins were used, chose nine components of anthraquinones, two components of anthrones, two components of flavan-3-ols, one component of procyanidin, one component of naphthalene, two components of phenylbutanones and one component of stilbene. Quantitative analysis of 18 components was performed with high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and antioxidative activities were measured with plasma taken from spontaneous familial hypercholesterolemia model rabbits. There was considerable variation among the specimens in the concentration of components and antioxidative activities on LDL. As a result of multiple regression analysis, significant multiple correlation coefficient for antioxidative activities on LDL (R = 0.914, P < 0.01) was found in relation to the concentrations of five components: aloe-emodin, chrysophanol, emodin 1-O-beta-D-glucoside, lindleyin and 6-hydroxymusizin 8-O-beta-D-glucoside. Three of the five components were not active in promoting antioxidative activity and there was no significant correlation between the concentrations of the most active component and the activity. We consider this a useful method for selecting of Rhubarb and propose a new scientific approach for the selection of natural medicines. (C) 2003 Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据