4.8 Article

Highly Sensitive Electrochemical Biosensor for Evaluation of Oxidative Stress Based on the Nanointerface of Graphene Nanocomposites Blended with Gold, Fe3O4, and Platinum Nanoparticles

期刊

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
卷 7, 期 33, 页码 18441-18449

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.5b04553

关键词

hydrogen peroxide; graphene nanosheets; gold nanoparticles; ferroferric oxide nanoparticles; Pt nanoparticles; electrochemical detection; living cell

资金

  1. National High Technology Research & Development Program of China [2015AA020502]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81325011, 21327902, 21175020]
  3. Major Science & Technology Project of Suzhou [ZXY2012028]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

High levels of H2O2 pertain to high oxidative stress and are associated with cancer, autoimmune, and neurodegenerative disease, and other related diseases. In this study, a sensitive H2O2 biosensor for evaluation of oxidative stress was fabricated on the basis of the reduced graphene oxide (RGO) nanocomposites decorated with Au, Fe3O4, and Pt nanoparticles (RGO/AuFe3O4/Pt) modified glassy carbon electrode (GCE) and used to detect the released H2O2 from cancer cells and assess the oxidative stress elicited from H2O2 in living cells. Electrochemical behavior of RGO/AuFe3O4/Pt nanocomposites exhibits excellent catalytic activity toward the relevant reduction with high selection and sensitivity, low overpotential of 0 V, low detection 0 limit of similar to 0.1 mu M, large linear range from 0.5 mu M to 11.5 mM, and outstanding reproducibility. The as-prepared biosensor was applied in the measurement of efflux of H2O2 from living cells including healthy normal cells and tumor cells under the external stimulation. The results display that this new nanocomposites-based biosensor is a promising candidate of nonenzymatic H2O2 sensor which has the possibility of application in clinical diagnostics to assess oxidative stress of different kinds of living cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据