4.3 Article

Microbial mat boundaries between chemolithotrophs and phototrophs in geothermal hot spring effluents

期刊

GEOMICROBIOLOGY JOURNAL
卷 21, 期 2, 页码 91-98

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/01490450490266334

关键词

boundary; chemolithotroph; cyanobacterial mat; hot spring; oxidation-reduction potential; phototroph; sulfur-turf; temperature gradient

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Among the various microbial mats that develop in geothermal hot springs in solfataric fields, colorless sulfur-turf (ST)-macroscopic white bundles consisting of large sickle-shaped bacteria belonging to Aquificales and elemental sulfur particles-develops in a limited environment of geothermal effluent containing hydrogen sulfide with neutral pH and low in oxygen. Photosynthetic cyanobacterial mat (CY) often grow just downstream of chemolithotrophic ST, or they coexist with ST where the temperature is slightly lower. Knowledge of the environmental regimes of these microbial mats will lead to better understanding of the distribution of thermophilic microorganisms on the Earth and provide clues about evolutionary processes in the microbial ecosystems of the Precambrian era. We studied the environmental parameters of the boundary zone and examined the distribution of these types of mats and measured the in situ growth rates of the microorganisms composing them. In situ examination revealed that temperature and Eh constrain the development of the microbial mats. At the boundary between ST and CY, temperature and Eh ranged between 51.1degreesC and 63.2degreesC and between -112 mV and -25 mV, respectively. These environmental parameters were not significantly different among Japanese, Yellowstone (North American), and Icelandic hot spring effluents with genetically similar thermal sulfur oxidizers. Sickle-shaped bacteria rarely coexist with cyanobacteria, although they can potentially grow in some CY environments. This suggests that the boundary between ST and CY might be partly determined by exclusive ecological competition.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据