4.6 Article

Maternal smoking and the risk of orofacial clefts - Susceptibility with NAT1 and NAT2 polymorphisms

期刊

EPIDEMIOLOGY
卷 15, 期 2, 页码 150-156

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/01.ede.0000112214.33432.cc

关键词

-

资金

  1. NICHD NIH HHS [HD39084] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIDCR NIH HHS [DE12898, DE13613] Funding Source: Medline
  3. ODCDC CDC HHS [U50/CCU913241] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Orofacial clefts are etiologically heterogeneous malformations. One probable cause is maternal smoking during pregnancy. The effect of maternal smoking may be modified by genes involved in biotransformation of toxic compounds derived from tobacco. We investigated whether polymorphic variants of fetal acetyl-N-transferases 1 (NAT1) and 2 (NAT2) interact with maternal cigarette smoking during early pregnancy to increase the risk of delivering an infant with an orofacial cleft. Methods: In a California population-based case-control study, we genotyped 421 infants born with an isolated cleft and 299 normal-formed controls for 2 NAT1 and 3 NAT2 single nucleotide polymorphisms Results: Although smoking was. independently associated with increased risks for both isolated cleft lip cleft palate and isolated cleft palate, no independent associations were found for NAT1 1088 or 1095 genotypes or for NAT2 acetylator status. However, the infant NAT1 1088 and 1095 polymorphisms were strongly associated with the risk of clefts among smoking mothers; infants with NAT1 1088 genotype AA versus TT (odds ratio [OR] = 3.9; 95% confidence interval = 1.1-17.2) and with NAT1 1095 genotype AA versus CC (OR = 4.2; 1.2-18.0). Infant NAT2 acetylator status did not appreciably affect susceptibility of the fetus to the teratogenic effects of maternal smoking. Conclusions: Our results suggest that maternal smoking during pregnancy may increase risk for orofacial clefts particularly among smokers whose fetuses have polymorphic variants of NAT1, an enzyme involved in phase II detoxification of tobacco smoke constituents.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据