4.4 Article

Elevated serum transferrin saturation and mortality

期刊

ANNALS OF FAMILY MEDICINE
卷 2, 期 2, 页码 133-138

出版社

ANNALS FAMILY MEDICINE
DOI: 10.1370/afm.25

关键词

hemochromatosis; transferrin; iron overload; cohort studies

资金

  1. PHS HHS [1D12HP00023-01] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND A large proportion of US adults have elevated transferrin saturation, an indicator of a predisposition for iron overload. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between elevated serum transferrin saturation and mortality. METHODS This cohort study was conducted using data from the First Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1 (1971-1974) (NHANES 1) merged with the NHANES I Epidemiologic Followup Study (1992) (N = 10,714). We used SUDAAN and appropriate weights to make population estimates for the adult US population (aged 25 to 74 years at baseline). All-cause mortality was evaluated in relation to serum transferrin saturation of greater than 45%, greater than 50%, greater than 55%, and greater than 60% using Cox proportional hazards regression. RESULTS In a Cox proportional hazards model controlling for potential confounders, including comorbid diseases, smoking, and cholesterol, all-cause mortality is significantly greater for persons with a serum transferrin saturation of more than 55%, compared with those with saturations below this cutoff (hazards ratio [HR] = 1.60, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.17-2.21). No one who died had hemochromatosis as any of the 20 listed causes of death. Many of the underlying causes of death for persons with serum transferrin saturation levels of more than 55% are common causes of death in the general population, although these persons were more likely to have died of cirrhosis and diabetes, a finding consistent with iron overload. CONCLUSIONS In this nationally representative cohort of adults, those with elevated serum transferrin saturation, more than 2% of the adult US population, were at increased risk for all-cause mortality.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据