4.1 Review

Cellular transplantation:: hurdles remaining before widespread clinical use

期刊

CURRENT OPINION IN CARDIOLOGY
卷 19, 期 2, 页码 154-161

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/00001573-200403000-00016

关键词

heart failure; cell transplantation; skeletal myoblasts; bone marrow cells

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose of review The last few years have witnessed a growing interest in regenerative therapy of the failing heart by cell transplantation. Special emphasis has been put on skeletal myoblasts and bone marrow-derived stem cells, with a flurry of experimental studies generating overall positive but occasionally conflicting results. It is thus appropriate to review the most important of these studies in light of the major issues that still impede widespread clinical use of cell therapy. Recent findings Recent laboratory data demonstrate the ability of autologous skeletal myoblasts to engraft into scarred myocardium and improve its function. Equally successful results have been reported with bone marrow-derived cells which, in contrast to myoblasts, are credited with a plasticity that might allow their transdifferentiation into cardiac or endothelial cells in response to organ-specific cues. However, some major questions remain unanswered; they include the choice of the optimal cell type in relation with the target patient population, the strategies for enhancing cell survival and functional integration, the clarification of the mechanisms of improvement, and the means of reducing invasiveness of cell delivery. Summary Although laboratory research attempts to overcome these persisting hurdles, the accumulated body of evidence warrants implementation of clinical trials. The earliest ones have now documented the feasibility of cell therapy. It is now appropriate to conduct safety and efficacy studies which, if carefully done, should allow assessment of the extent to which this concept of regenerative therapy can be made a clinical reality.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据