4.7 Article

Compaction behavior of argillaceous sediments as function of diagenesis

期刊

MARINE AND PETROLEUM GEOLOGY
卷 21, 期 3, 页码 349-362

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2004.01.002

关键词

argillaceous sediments; compaction; diagenesis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The paper presents the results of laboratory compaction tests on samples of Kimmeridge clay taken from two different locations in the UK. The main objective of the laboratory tests is to determine how diagenesis affects the hydro-mechanical properties and compaction behavior of argillaceous sediments. The two Kimmeridge clays used in the tests are essentially from the same parent material but have undergone different degrees of mechanical and chemical diagenesis. The laboratory tests are designed to determine the effects of mechanical loading and chemical processes on changes in porosity, permeability, compressibility, strength and effective horizontal stress in argillaceous materials. Another objective of the study is to investigate the adequacy of soil mechanical constitutive models in predicting the response of argillaceous materials to conditions corresponding to burial depths in sedimentary basins. The tests on Kimmeridge clay are carried out to as high as 150 MPa effective vertical stress corresponding to about 9 km in burial. The results indicate that mechanical compaction and burial depth cannot explain the differences in the hydro-mechanical behavior of the tested materials. The differences in hydro-mechanical response are attributed to chemical diagenesis by precipitation of minerals in the pores of the sediment. Other observed effects of chemical diagenesis on hydro-mechanical behavior of lithified sediments are: (1) increase in apparent pre-consolidation stress; (2) decrease in compressibility; (3) decrease in permeability; and (4) decrease in effective horizontal stress. Implications of the results to fluid flow and overpressure development in sedimentary basins are discussed. (C) 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据