4.3 Article

Competitive formation of hydroxycarbonate green rust 1 versus hydroxysulphate green rust 2 in Shewanella putrefaciens cultures

期刊

GEOMICROBIOLOGY JOURNAL
卷 21, 期 2, 页码 79-90

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/01490450490266316

关键词

bacterial iron reduction; biomineralisation; diffuse reflectance infrared Fourier transform spectroscopy (DRIFTS); green rust; microbiologically influenced corrosion (MIC); Mossbauer spectroscopy; lepidocrocite

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The formation of hydroxysulphate green rust 2, a Fe(II-III) compound commonly found during corrosion processes of iron-based materials in seawater, has not yet been reported in bacterial cultures. Here we used Shewanella putrefaciens, a dissimilatory iron-reducing bacterium to anaerobically catalyze the transformation of a ferric oxyhydroxide, lepidocrocite (gamma-FeOOH), into Fe(H) in the presence of various sulphate concentrations. Biotransformation assails of gamma-FeOOH were performed with formate as the electron donor under a variety of concentrations. The results showed that the competitive formation of hydroxycarbonate green rust 1 (GR1(SO32-)) and hydroxysulphate green rust 2 (GR2(SO42-)) depended upon the relative ratio (R) of bicarbonate and sulphate concentrations. When R greater than or equal to 0.17, GR1(CO42-) only was formed whereas when R < 0.17, a mixture of GR2(SO42-) and GR1(CO32-) was obtained. These results demonstrated that the hydroxysulphate GR2 can originate from the microbial reduction of gamma-FeOOH and confirmed the preference for carbonate oversulphate during green rust precipitation. The solid phases were characterized by X-ray diffraction, transmission Mossbauer spectroscopy and scanning electron microscopy. Diffuse reflectance infrared Fourier transform spectroscopy confirmed the presence of intercalated carbonate and sulphate in green rust's structure. This study sheds light on the influence of dissimilatory iron-reducing bacteria on microbiologically influenced corrosion.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据