4.8 Article

High-density lipoproteins reduce the effect of endotoxin on cytokine production and systemic hemodynamics in cirrhotic rats with ascites

期刊

JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY
卷 40, 期 3, 页码 424-430

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2003.11.017

关键词

cirrhosis; spontaneous bacterial peritonitis; lipopolysaccharides; endotoxin; cytokines; lipoproteins; high-density lipoprotein

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background/Aims: Hypersensitivity to endotoxin is a recognized feature in cirrhosis. High-density lipoproteins (HDL) have a high capacity to inactivate endotoxin. The aim was to determine if HDL reduces the effect of endotoxin on cytokine production and systemic hemodynamics in experimental cirrhosis. Methods: The study was performed in control and rats with carbon-tetrachloride induced cirrhosis with ascites. Hemodynamic parameters were determined before and after several doses of endotoxin. The effects of 25 mug/kg of endotoxin on the serum concentration of TNFalpha and mean arterial pressure (MAP) were determined after treatment with HDL (80 mg/kg) or saline. Results: Whereas endotoxin decreased MAP only at doses of 100 and 1000 mug/kg in control rats, in cirrhotic rats significant hypotension occurred at doses of 25, 50, 100, and 1000 mug/kg. Following the administration of endotoxin (25 mug/kg) the serum levels of TNFalpha were 140 times higher in cirrhotic than in control rats (89 835 :L 21090 vs. 625 +/- 137 pg/ml; P < 0.001). Serum TNFalpha was 80% lower in cirrhotic rats pretreated with HDL (18 890 +/- 5012 pg/ml; P < 0.001) than in those pretreated with saline. The administration of endotoxin (25 mug/kg) was associated with a significant lower decrease of MAP in cirrhotic rats pretreated with HDL than in those receiving saline (11.9 +/- 3.5 vs. 24.7 +/- 4.3 %; P < 0.05). Conclusions: HDL attenuates the increased effect of endotoxin on cytokine production and systemic hemodynamic in cirrhosis. (C) 2003 European Association for the Study of Liver. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据