4.2 Article

Spatial dispersion of repolarization is a key factor in the arrhythmogenicity of long QT syndrome

期刊

JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY
卷 15, 期 3, 页码 323-331

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1046/j.1540-8167.2004.03493.x

关键词

long QT syndrome; arrhythmia; guinea pig; reentry; action potential

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Repolarization Distribution in LQT3. Introduction: The occurrence of significant spatial dispersion of repolarization in vivo as it relates to the mechanism of arrhythmia formation in the long QT syndrome (LQTS) continues to be questioned. Methods and Results: We investigated a guinea pig model of LQT3 using anthopleurin-A (AP-A) to study the contribution of rate-dependent spatial dispersion of repollarization in the intact heart to the arrhythmogenicity of LQTS. Optical action potentials were measured using potentiometric fluorescent dye di-4ANEPPS in Langendorff-perfused hearts with induced AV block. AP-A exacerbated the normal uniform epicardial apex-base action potential duration (APD) gradient, resulting in rate-dependent increased APD dispersion and nonuniform APD gradient. Spontaneous focal premature beats induced functional conduction block along boundaries where large nonuniform APD gradient occurred setting the stage for circulating wavefronts and ventricular tachyarrhythmia (VT). Endocardial ablation abolished spontaneous VT, but nonuniform epicardial APD gradient persisted and could be challenged by a stimulated premature stimulus to induce VT. Conclusion: The study shows that in LQT3, spatial variations in steady-state properties result in zones of nonuniform APD gradients. These provide a substrate for functional conduction block and reentrant excitation when challenged by subendocardial early afterdepollarization-triggered premature beats. The study emphasizes the key importance of spatial dispersion of repolarization, whether located in epicardial or intramyocardial layers, in arrhythmia formation in LQTS.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据