4.5 Article

An electrochemical flow analysis system for putrescine using immobilized putrescine oxidase and horseradish peroxidase

期刊

ELECTROANALYSIS
卷 16, 期 4, 页码 260-267

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/elan.200302803

关键词

putrescine; spermidine; cadaverine; immobilized putrescine oxidase; horseradish oxidase; electrochemical flow analysis system

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An electrochemical flow analysis system was optimized together with immobilized putrescine oxidase and horseradish peroxidase for putrescine measurement. Four coupling agents, suberic acid bis(N-hydroxysuccinimide ester), gamma-maleimidobutyric N-hydroxysuccinimide ester, 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)carbodiimide and glutaraldehyde, were used for immobilizing the two enzymes on porous aminopropyl glass beads to form a bienzymic detection column. Although the glutaraldehyde crosslinking procedure offered the highest response, the immobilized bienzyme system was responsive to putrescine, spermidine (123% of the putrescine response at 250 muM) and cadaverine (98% of the putrescine response). In contrast, the enzymes immobilized on the glass beads using suberic acid bis(N-hydroxysuccinimide ester) offered significantly better selectivity towards putrescine at the same concentration. For comparison, cadaverine and spermidine only provoked a response of 4.7% and 27.5% of the putrescine signal. The response to cadaverine and spermidine was further suppressed by lowering the detection pH from 8 to 7. At 250 PM, the response obtained for cadaverine and spermidine was only 1.5% and 3.9%, respectively, of the signal obtained for putrescine. A linear response to putrescine was obtained from 5 to 75 muM (0.629 muAs muM(-1), R-2= 0.997) with a detection limit of 5 muM (S/N= 3). The amperometric response retained 75% of its initial value after 600 repeated injections. The immobilized PUO/HRP (putrescine oxidase/horseradish peroxidase) was successfully demonstrated for measuring putrescine in fish extracts as an indicator of fish spoilage.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据