4.2 Article

Treatment of nonunions with nonglycosylated recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 delivered from a fibrin matrix

期刊

VETERINARY SURGERY
卷 33, 期 2, 页码 112-118

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO
DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-950X.2004.04018.x

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective-To report the results of the treatment of nonunions with nonglycosylated recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 (nglBMP-2) delivered from a designed fibrin matrix. Study Design-Experimental trial in rodents and prospective clinical study in dogs and cats with nonunion fractures. Animals-Twenty adult female, albino, Sprague-Dawley rats; 8 client-owned cats and dogs. Methods-After development of a fibrin matrix and evaluation of nglBMP-2 in a rodent femoral defect model, 8 consecutive long bone nonunion fractures (no progression in healing in greater than or equal to 3 months), were treated using 300 mug nglBMP-2 in a liquid fibrin precursor, injected into the defect gap after fracture revision and stabilization, or through a stab incision into the fracture site. The fibrin matrix was designed to clot in the wound after 60 seconds and to release the nglBMP-2 continuously over several days. Results-Using only fibrin gel, 7% of the rat femoral defect was filled with new formed bone compared with 79% defect filling using 2 mug nglBMP-2 (P=.006). Five and 10 mug nglBMP in fibrin resulted in union of all femoral defects with complete filling of the gap with new bone. Bony bridging and clinical healing was achieved in 7 patients within 24 weeks of administration of nglBMP-2. Conclusions-Application of nglBMP-2 in a functional matrix can induce bone healing. Controlled release of nglBMP-2 from a fibrin matrix mimics the natural fracture hematoma. Clinical Relevance-nglBMP-2/fibrin can successfully replace a cancellous bone autograft in fracture treatment with an associated reduction in graft donor site morbidity and surgical time. (C) Copyright 2004 by The American College of Veterinary Surgeons.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据