4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Prognostic significance of surgical-pathologic multiple-station N1 disease in non-small cell carcinoma of the lung

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY
卷 25, 期 3, 页码 434-438

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2003.12.005

关键词

non-small cell lung cancer; nodal involvement; multiple-station N1, N2; surgical resection

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: The surgical outcome of pathologic N1 disease in resectable, non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) is controversial. The prognosis of the patients with multiple/bulky N2 disease was invariably dismal. However, the prognostic significance of tumor involvement in more than one hilar or intralobar lymph node station has not been fully described. Methods: From 1996 to 2002, 181 patients with NSCLC had complete resection. Four levels of N1 nodes and N2 nodes were identified using the new regional lymph node classification for lung cancer staging. There were 67 patients (37%) with no nodal disease (NO), 43 patients (24%) with N1 and 71 patients (39%) with N2 disease. The N1 subgroup cases were reviewed. The prognostic significances of single and multiple N1 diseases were tested. Results: The cumulative postoperative survival at 3 and 5 years was 57 and 29%, respectively. The survival associated with single-station N1 disease was significantly better than that of multiple-station N1 disease (45 vs 32% at 5 years; P = 0.03). Five-year survival was similar in patients with multiple N1 disease and patients with single-station N2 involvement (32 vs 31% at 5 years; P = 0.84). However, no patient survived when tumor was detected in more than one mediastinal station (i.e. multiple N2 disease). Conclusions: It was suggested that N1 disease is a compound of two subgroups: one involving in one node and the other (multiple N1 disease) in which the postoperative prognosis was not statistically different from that of N2 disease. (C) 2003 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据