4.4 Article

The impact of race on survival in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A matched analysis

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY
卷 25, 期 2, 页码 94-97

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2003.11.005

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To determine if nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) exhibits significant prognostic differences in Chinese versus white patients. Methods: From the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database for the time period 1988 to 2000, all cases of NPC were extracted and staging variables computed. To each case of NPC diagnosed in a Chinese patient, a case of NPC in a white patient was randomly matched for age at diagnosis, gender, grade, stage, and treatment modality. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was then conducted for the matched groups comparing overall survival and disease-specific survival both for the overall matched cohort and stage stratified cohorts. Results: Among 1,520 cases of NPC, 338 were identified in Chinese patients with staging information. Of these, 171 were successfully matched to white patients. Average age at presentation was 51.5 years with a 3:1 male predominance. Overall survival was substantially better for Chinese patients (mean survival, 94 months; median survival, 95 months) than for white patients (81 months and 64 months, P =.037). Stratified for stage, overall survival was better for Chinese patients for stage 3 but not stage 4 disease (P =.012 and P =.447, respectively). Disease-specific survival was not substantially different between Chinese patients (mean survival, 116 months) and white patients (mean survival 117 months, P =.99). No differences in disease-specific survival were identified for race when stratified by stage (all P > .05). Conclusions: Although overall survival is better for Chinese patients with NPC compared with white patients, disease-specific survival is similar between these racial groups. These data suggest that the biological behavior of NPC is relatively independent of race. (C) 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据