4.6 Article

Identification of important residues of insulin-like peptide 5 and its receptor RXFP4 for ligand-receptor interactions

期刊

ARCHIVES OF BIOCHEMISTRY AND BIOPHYSICS
卷 558, 期 -, 页码 127-132

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.abb.2014.07.010

关键词

INSL5; RXFP4; Ligand-receptor interaction; Electrostatic interaction; Mutagenesis

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31270824, 30970609]
  2. National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) [2010CB912604]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds from Tongji University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Insulin-like peptide 5 (INSL5) is an insulin/relaxin superfamily peptide involved in the regulation of glucose homeostasis by activating its receptor RXFP4, which can also be activated by relaxin-3 in vitro. To determine the interaction mechanism of INSL5 with its receptor RXFP4, we studied their electrostatic interactions using a charge-exchange mutagenesis approach. First, we identified three negatively charged extracellular residues (Glul 00, Asp104 and Glul 82) in human RXFP4 that were important for receptor activation by wild-type INSL5. Second, we demonstrated that two positively charged B-chain Arg residues (B13Arg and B23Arg) in human INSL5 were involved in receptor binding and activation. Third, we proposed probable electrostatic interactions between INSL5 and RXFP4: the B-chain central B13Arg of INSL5 interacts with both Asp104 and Glu182 of RXFP4, meanwhile the B-chain C-terminal B23Arg of INSL5 interacts with both Glu100 and Asp104 of RXFP4. The present electrostatic interactions between INSL5 and RXFP4 were similar to our previously identified interactions between relaxin-3 and RXFP4, but had subtle differences that might be caused by the different B-chain C-terminal conformations of relaxin-3 and INSL5 because a dipeptide exchange at the B-chain C-terminus significantly decreased the activity of INSL5 and relaxin-3 to receptor RXFP4. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据