4.6 Article

Ursodeoxycholic and deoxycholic acids: A good and a bad bile acid for intestinal calcium absorption

期刊

ARCHIVES OF BIOCHEMISTRY AND BIOPHYSICS
卷 540, 期 1-2, 页码 19-25

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.abb.2013.09.018

关键词

UDCA; NaDOC; Intestinal Ca2+ absorption; Ca2+-ATPase; Na+/Ca2+ exchanger; Calbindin D-28k

资金

  1. CONICET [PIP 2010-2012]
  2. Ministerio de Ciencia y Tecnica de la Provincia de Cordoba [PID 2010]
  3. SECyT (Universidad Nacional de Cordoba)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) on intestinal Ca2+ absorption and to find out whether the inhibition of this process caused by NaDOC could be prevented by UDCA. Chicks were employed and divided into four groups: (a) controls, (b) treated with 10 mM NaDOC, (c) treated with 60 mu g UDCA/100 g of b.w., and (d) treated with 10 mM NaDOC and 60 mu g UDCA/100 g of b.w. UDCA enhanced intestinal Ca2+ absorption, which was time and dose-dependent. UDCA avoided the inhibition of intestinal Ca2+ absorption caused by NaDOC. Both bile acids altered protein and gene expression of molecules involved in the transcellular pathway of intestinal Ca2+ absorption, but in the opposite way. UDCA aborted the oxidative stress produced by NaDOC in the intestine. UDCA and UDCA plus NaDOC increased vitamin D receptor protein expression. In conclusion, UDCA is a beneficial bile acid for intestinal Ca2+ absorption. Contrarily, NaDOC inhibits the intestinal cation absorption through triggering oxidative stress. The use of UDCA in patients with cholestasis would be benefited because of the protective effect on the intestinal Ca2+ absorption, avoiding the inhibition caused by hydrophobic bile acids and neutralizing the oxidative stress. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据