4.6 Review

Exploring the role of post-translational modifications on protein-protein interactions with survivin

期刊

ARCHIVES OF BIOCHEMISTRY AND BIOPHYSICS
卷 538, 期 2, 页码 64-70

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.abb.2013.07.027

关键词

Apoptosis; Cell proliferation; IAP; Protein-protein interaction

资金

  1. Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia (FCT, Portugal
  2. ) [PEst-C/QUI/UI0062/2013, SFRH/BD/91067/2012, CENTRO-07-ST24-FEDER-002034]
  3. European Union [PEst-C/QUI/UI0062/2013, SFRH/BD/91067/2012, CENTRO-07-ST24-FEDER-002034]
  4. QREN [PEst-C/QUI/UI0062/2013, SFRH/BD/91067/2012, CENTRO-07-ST24-FEDER-002034]
  5. FEDER [PEst-C/QUI/UI0062/2013, SFRH/BD/91067/2012, CENTRO-07-ST24-FEDER-002034]
  6. COMPETE [PEst-C/QUI/UI0062/2013, SFRH/BD/91067/2012, CENTRO-07-ST24-FEDER-002034]
  7. Mais Centro- Programa Operacional Regional do Centro e Uniao Europeia/Fundo Europeu de Desenvolvimento Regional
  8. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BD/91067/2012] Funding Source: FCT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Survivin is a member of the inhibitor of apoptosis protein (IAP) family with crucial roles in apoptosis and cell cycle regulation. Post-translational modifications (PTMs) have a ubiquitous role in the regulation of a diverse range of proteins' cellular functions and survivin is not an exception. Phosphorylation, acetylation and ubiquitination seem to regulate survivin anti-apoptotic and mitotic roles and also its nuclear localization. In the present review we explore the role of PTMs on protein-protein interactions focused on survivin to provide new insights into the functions and cell localization of this IAP in pathophysiological conditions, which might help the envisioning of novel targeted therapies for diseases characterized by impaired survivin activity. Protein-protein interaction analysis was performed with bioinformatics tools based on published data aiming to give an integrated perspective of this IAP's role in the cell. (c) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据