4.6 Article

Inhibition of C2C12 myotube atrophy by a novel HSP70 inducer, celastrol, via activation of Akt1 and ERK1/2 pathways

期刊

ARCHIVES OF BIOCHEMISTRY AND BIOPHYSICS
卷 537, 期 1, 页码 21-30

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.abb.2013.06.006

关键词

Celastrol; Countermeasure; Dexamethasone; HSF1; HSP72; Muscle atrophy

资金

  1. Korea Aerospace Research Institute
  2. Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency
  3. research grant Fundamental Study of Manned Space Technology for Microgravity Environment Utilization
  4. Korea Aerospace Research Institute (KARI) [FR13350W01]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Celastrol (CEL) is known as a potent inducer of heat shock protein (HSP) in non-muscle cells and exhibits cytoprotective function and inhibitory effects on proteasome and glucocorticoid receptor activities. To investigate an anti-atrophic effect of CEL on skeletal muscle cells, C2C12 myotubes were treated with 150 mu M dexamethasone (DEX) for 24 h and 1.5 mu M CEL was added for the last 6 h during the 24 h DEX treatment. Compared to the control, the myotube diameter was reduced by a factor of 0.30 by DEX, but CEL treatment almost abrogated the DEX-induced atrophy. CEL treatment also increased expression of HSP72 and phosphorylation of heat shock transcription factor 1 (p-HSF1) 11-fold and 3.4-fold, respectively, as well as accumulation of p-HSF1 in the nucleus. Furthermore, CEL treatment elevated activities of Akt1, p70/S6K and ERK1/2 2.0- to 4.4-fold whereas DEX had no effect on these signaling activities. Inhibition of Akt1 and ERK1/2 pathways by specific inhibitors confirmed CEL-induced anti-atrophic effect. Moreover, DEX-mediated downregulation of FoxO3 phosphorylation and upregulation of MuRF1 expression and proteasome activity were abrogated by CEL treatment. These results demonstrate a novel anti-atrophic function of CEL in muscle cells via both activation of protein anabolic signals and suppression of catabolic signaling activities. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据