4.6 Article

X-ray crystal structure of the cytochrome P450 2B4 active site mutant F297A in complex with clopidogrel: Insights into compensatory rearrangements of the binding pocket

期刊

ARCHIVES OF BIOCHEMISTRY AND BIOPHYSICS
卷 530, 期 2, 页码 64-72

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.abb.2012.12.016

关键词

Cytochrome P450; P450 2B4 F297A; Clopidogrel; X-ray crystal structure; Ligand docking

资金

  1. NIH [ES003619, GM098538]
  2. National Institute of Health
  3. National Center for Research Resources
  4. Biomedical Technology Program
  5. United States Department of Energy of Biological and Environmental Research

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Prior X-ray crystal structures of cytochrome P450 2B4 revealed the pivotal role of rearrangement of the side chains of residues F206 and F297 in the active site in accommodating various inhibitors or substrates. To explore the role of these residues, 2B4 F206A and F297A were created by site-directed mutagenesis and characterized functionally. The structure of F297A with clopidogrel demonstrated the reorientation of the ligand such that the methyl ester group is oriented toward the heme, whereas the thiophene moiety now extends to the additional void in the F297A mutant. Most interestingly, movement of the I helix and several amino acid side chains within the active site was observed in apparent response to the altered binding orientation. Results of flexible docking using the 2B4 wild type or the F297A-virtual mutant positioned either the thiophene or chlorophenyl group closer to heme. However, docking of clopidogrel using the real F297A mutant or a virtual mutant with the I-helix re-positioned oriented clopidogrel preferentially with either the methyl ester or the chlorophenyl group closest to heme. The study provides insight into how the altered active site adapts to accommodate and interact with the substrate in a distinct orientation while maintaining the overall closed protein conformation. (c) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据