4.6 Review

The monooxygenase, peroxidase, and peroxygenase properties of cytochrome P450

期刊

ARCHIVES OF BIOCHEMISTRY AND BIOPHYSICS
卷 522, 期 2, 页码 71-89

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.abb.2012.01.003

关键词

Cytochrome P450; Monooxygenase; Peroxidase; Peroxygenase; Compound I; Peroxide shunt

资金

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  2. Canadian Institutes of Health Research

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This review examines the monooxygenase, peroxidase, and peroxygenase properties of cytochrome P450 (P450)(1) enzymes and their mechanisms of action in archaeal, bacterial, and mammalian systems. In the P450 catalytic cycle, a transient iron oxo monooxygenating species is generated that reacts with substrate to produce a monooxygenated product. We describe results of early investigations that endeavored to trap and detect this elusive monooxygenating species, as well as results of experiments that attempted to generate and characterize this active oxidant spectroscopically after reacting ferric P450 enzymes with peroxy compounds (e.g. peroxides, peracids) or single oxygen atom donors (e.g. periodate, iodosobenzene). Surrogate oxidants were able to promote P450-catalyzed monooxygenations in a manner similar to that of O-2/NAD(P)H, suggesting involvement of a common transitory monooxygenating species in the two pathways. This common P450 oxidant was characterized as a porphyrin radical iron(IV) oxo complex and assigned a Compound I structure (Por(+)Fe(IV)=O) exhibiting a formal Fe(V) oxidation state. Other reactive oxidants, such as the ferric oxenoid complex (PorFe(III)=O), ferryloxy radical species (PorFe(IV)-O.), and perferryloxo entity (PorFe(V)=O), were also proposed to function as P450 monooxygenating species. We also discuss the possible involvement of the ferriperoxo (PorFe(III)-OO-) and ferrihydroperoxo (PorFe(III)-OOH) species as alternative oxidants in P450-mediated monooxygenation reactions. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据