4.6 Review

Liver and bone

期刊

ARCHIVES OF BIOCHEMISTRY AND BIOPHYSICS
卷 503, 期 1, 页码 84-94

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.abb.2010.05.030

关键词

Osteoporosis; Metabolic bone disease; Cirrhosis; Cholestasis; Liver transplantation

资金

  1. Centro de Investigacion Biomedica en Red de Enfermedades Hepaticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd)
  2. Instituto de Salud Carlos III
  3. Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion, Spain [FIS-08/0105]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Osteoporosis is a frequent complication in patients with chronic liver disease, especially in end-stages and in cases with chronic cholestasis, hemochromatosis and alcohol abuse. The problem is more critical in transplant patients when bone loss is accelerated during the period immediately after transplantation, leading to a greater incidence of fractures. Advanced age, low body mass index and severity of the liver disease are the main risk factors for bone disease in patients with cholestasis. Mechanisms underlying osteoporosis in chronic liver disease are complex and poorly understood, but osteoporosis mainly results from low bone formation, related to the effects of retained substances of cholestasis, such as bilirubin and bile acids, or to the effects of alcohol on osteoblastic cells. Increased bone resorption has also been described in cholestatic women with advanced disease. Although there is no specific treatment, bisphosphonates associated with supplements of calcium and vitamin D are effective for increasing bone mass in patients with chronic cholestasis and after liver transplantation. The outcome in reducing the incidence of fractures has not been adequately demonstrated essentially because of the low number of patients included in the therapeutic trials. Randomized studies assessing bisphosphonates in larger series of patients, the development of new drugs for osteoporosis and the improvement in the management of liver transplant recipients may change the future. (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据