4.7 Article

An efficient, high-order perturbation approach for flow in random porous media via Karhunen-Loeve and polynomial expansions

期刊

JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS
卷 194, 期 2, 页码 773-794

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2003.09.015

关键词

Monte Carlo simulations; heterogeneity; uncertainty; higher-order approximation; Karhunen-Loeve decomposition

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, we attempt to obtain higher-order solutions of the means and (co)variances of hydraulic head for saturated flow in randomly heterogeneous porous media on the basis of the combination of Karhunen-Loeve decomposition, polynomial expansion, and perturbation methods. We first decompose the log hydraulic conductivity Y - ln K-s, as an infinite series on the basis of a set of orthogonal Gaussian standard random variables {xi(i)}. The coefficients of the series are related to eigenvalues and eigenfunctions of the covariance function of log hydraulic conductivity. We then write head as an infinite series whose terms h((n)) represent head of nth order in terms of ay, the standard deviation of Y, and derive a set of recursive equations for h((n)). We then decompose h((n)) with polynomial expansions in terms of the products of n Gaussian random variables. The coefficients in these series are determined by substituting decompositions of Y and h((n)) into those recursive equations. We solve the mean head up to fourth-order in sigma(Y) and the head variances up to third-order in sigma(Y)(2). We conduct Monte Carlo (MC) simulation and compare MC results against approximations of different orders from the moment-equation approach based on Karhunen-Loeve decomposition (KLME). We also explore the validity of the KLME approach for different degrees of medium variability and various correlation scales. It is evident that the KLME approach with higher-order corrections is superior to the conventional first-order approximations and is computationally more efficient than the Monte Carlo simulation. (C) 2003 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据