4.6 Article

Quantification and identification of mitochondrial proteins containing vicinal dithiols

期刊

ARCHIVES OF BIOCHEMISTRY AND BIOPHYSICS
卷 504, 期 2, 页码 228-235

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.abb.2010.09.003

关键词

Protein thiols; Vicinal dithiols; Mitochondria; Redox-DIGE; Oxidative stress

资金

  1. Medical Research Council
  2. Gates Cambridge Trust
  3. Medical Research Council [MC_U105663142] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. MRC [MC_U105663142] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Vicinal dithiols may play a role in mitochondrial antioxidant defences and in redox signalling. We quantified protein vicinal dithiols within mammalian mitochondria using the vicinal dithiol-specific reagent phenylarsine oxide (PAO). We found 5-15% of thiols exposed on mitochondrial proteins were vicinal dithiols and that these thiols were particularly sensitive to oxidation by hydrogen peroxide. To visualise these proteins we used PAO to block vicinal dithiols, followed by alkylation of other thiols with N-ethylmaleimide (NEM). The PAD was then removed with 2,3-dimercapto-1-propanesulfonic acid (DMPS) and the exposed vicinal dithiols were labelled with iodoacetamide-biotin. To identify these proteins, we developed a selective proteomic methodology, based on Redox difference in gel electrophoresis (Redox-DIGE). Vicinal dithiol proteins were selectively labelled with a red fluorescent thiol-reactive Cy5 maleimide and mixed with Cy3 maleimide labelled protein in which vicinal dithiols remained untagged. Individual proteins were resolved by 2D gel electrophoresis and fluorescent scanning revealed vicinal dithiol proteins by the increase in Cy5 red fluorescence. These proteins were identified by peptide mass fingerprinting and mass spectrometry. These findings are consistent with roles for mitochondrial vicinal dithiol proteins in antioxidant defence and redox signalling and these methodologies will enable these roles to be explored. (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据