4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Evolution of carotene desaturation: The complication of a simple pathway

期刊

ARCHIVES OF BIOCHEMISTRY AND BIOPHYSICS
卷 483, 期 2, 页码 169-174

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.abb.2008.10.004

关键词

zeta-carotene desaturation; cis/trans isomers; Crtl-desaturases; Pds-desaturases; Phytoene desaturation; Poly-cis pathway; Prolycopene

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In a series of desaturation reactions, the trienoic Structures of phytoene and diapophytoene are extended to a maximum of 15 or I I conjugated double bonds, respectively. After the cloning of several genes from bacteria and eukaryotes, the desaturation reactions were first analyzed in a heterologous host by functional genetic complementation. In addition, different desaturases were heterologously expressed and the reactions studied in vitro. This revealed that in archaea, non-photosynthetic prokaryotes and fungi the desaturases differ significantly from convergently evolved desaturases in cyanobacteria, Chlorobaculum (old name Chlorobium) species and eukaryotic photosynthetic organisms including plants. Detailed analysis of the desaturation reactions including the determination of the Substrates converted by the enzymes, the intermediates and the products formed in the reactions revealed the bacterial all-trans desaturation pathway catalyzed by a single enzyme and the cyanobacterial/plant type poly-cis desaturation pathway which involves two closely related desaturases. This indicates that in the course of evolution of carotenogenesis from bacteria via cyanobacteria to plants, the simple Situation of one enzyme for the entire reaction sequence from phytoene to all-trans lycopene changed to a more complex process. Three individual enzymes, newly acquired phytoene and xi-carotene desaturases, as well as a carotene isomerase which is phylogenetically related to Crtl are involved. Only the Crtl-type enzymes seem to have the property to catalyze cis to trans conversion of carotenes. (C) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据