4.7 Article

Long-term subthreshold electrical stimulation of the left stellate ganglion and a canine model of sudden cardiac death

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2003.07.053

关键词

-

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL66389, HL71140, P50 HL52319] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVES We sought to develop a high-yield canine model of sudden cardiac death (SCD). BACKGROUND Because electrical stimulation is a powerful means to elicit nerve sprouting, we hypothesize that subthreshold electrical stimulation is more effective than nerve growth factor (NGF) infusion in inducing nerve sprouting and SCD in dogs with myocardial infarction (MI) and complete atrioventricular block (CAVB). METHODS We gave subthreshold electrical stimulation to the left stellate ganglion (LSG) in six normal dogs for 41 +/- 9 days (protocol 1) and to six dogs with MI and CAVB for 41 +/- 29 days, while continuously monitoring their cardiac rhythm (protocol 2). We also monitored the rhythm of two dogs with MI, CAVB, and NGF infusion to the LSG and determined the ventricular nerve density in six healthy control dogs. RESULTS In protocol 1, the hearts from dogs with LSG electrical stimulation had a higher density of nerve fibers immunopositive to tyrosine hydroxylase, synaptophysin, and growth-associated protein-43 than those of normal control dogs (p < 0.01). In protocol 2, there was a high magnitude of cardiac nerve sprouting in all dogs studied. Ventricular tachycardia greater than or equal to8 beats and greater than or equal to20 beats was more frequent in dogs with electrical stimulation than in dogs with NGF infusion to the LSG (36 +/- 60 and 11 +/- 17 vs. 4.7 +/- 6.1 and 0.1 +/- 0.33 episodes per day, p < 0.05 and p < 0.03, respectively). Four of six dogs in protocol 2 had SCD. CONCLUSIONS Subthreshold electrical stimulation of the LSG induces cardiac nerve sprouting and sympathetic hyperinnervation and facilitates the development of a high-yield canine model of ventricular arrhythmia and SCD. (C) 2004 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据