4.6 Article

Functional role of the lock and key motif at the subunit interface of glutathione transferase P1-1

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 279, 期 10, 页码 9586-9596

出版社

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M312320200

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The glutathione transferases (GSTs) represent a superfamily of dimeric proteins. Each subunit has an active site, but there is no evidence for the existence of catalytically active monomers. The lock and key motif is responsible for a highly conserved hydrophobic interaction in the subunit interface of pi, mu, and alpha class glutathione transferases. The key residue, which is either Phe or Tyr (Tyr(50) in human GSTP1-1) in one subunit, is wedged into a hydrophobic pocket of the other subunit. To study how an essentially inactive subunit influences the activity of the neighboring subunit, we have generated the heterodimer composed of subunits from the fully active human wild-type GSTP1-1 and the nearly inactive mutant Y50A obtained by mutation of the key residue Tyr(50) to Ala. Although the key residue is located far from the catalytic center, the k(cat) value of mutant Y50A decreased about 1300-fold in comparison with the wild-type enzyme. The decrease of the kcat value of the heterodimer by about 27-fold rather than the expected 2-fold in comparison with the wild-type enzyme indicates that the two active sites of the dimeric enzyme work synergistically. Further evidence for cooperativity was found in the nonhyperbolic GSH saturation curves. A network of hydrogen-bonded water molecules, found in crystal structures of GSTP1-1, connects the two active sites and the main chain carbonyl group of Tyr50, thereby offering a mechanism for communication between the two active sites. It is concluded that a subunit becomes catalytically competent by positioning the key residue of one subunit into the lock pocket of the other subunit, thereby stabilizing the loop following the helix alpha2, which interacts directly with GSH.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据