4.8 Review

Promotion of iridium-catalyzed methanol carbonylation: Mechanistic studies of the cativa process

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
卷 126, 期 9, 页码 2847-2861

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ja039464y

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The iridium/iodide-catalyzed carbonylation of methanol to acetic acid is promoted by carbonyl complexes of W, Re, Ru, and Os and simple iodides of Zn, Cd, Hg, Ga, and In. Iodide salts (Lil and Bu4NI) are catalyst poisons. In situ IR spectroscopy shows that the catalyst resting state (at H2O levels greater than or equal to 5% w/w) is fac,cis-[Ir(CO)(2)I3Me](-), 2. The stoichiometric carbonylation of 2 into [Ir(CO)(2)I-3(COMe)]-, 6, is accelerated by substoichiometric amounts of neutral promoter species (e.g., [Ru(CO)(3)I-2)(2), [Ru(CO)(2)I-2](n), InI3, GaI3, and ZnI2). The rate increase is approximately proportional to promoter concentration for promoter: Ir ratios of 0-0.2. By contrast anionic Ru complexes (e.g., [Ru(CO)(3)I-3](-), [Ru(CO)(2)I-4](2-)) do not promote carbonylation of 2 and BU4NI is an inhibitor. Mechanistic studies indicate that the promoters accelerate carbonylation of 2 by abstracting an iodide ligand from the Ir center, allowing coordination of CO to give [Ir(CO)(3)I2Me], 4, identified by high-pressure IR and NMR spectroscopy. Migratory CO insertion is ca. 700 times faster for 4 than for 2 (85 degreesC, PhCI), representing a lowering of DeltaG(+/-) by 20 kJ mol(-1). Ab initio calculations support a more facile methyl migration in 4, the principal factor being decreased pi-back-donation to the carbonyl ligands compared to 2. The fac,cis isomer of [Ir(CO)(2)I-3(COMe)](-), 6a (as its Ph4As+ salt), was characterized by X-ray crystallography. A catalytic mechanism is proposed in which the promoter [M(CO)(m)I-n] (M = Ru, In; m = 3, 0; n = 2, 3) binds I- to form [M(CO)(m)In+1]-H3O+ and catalyzes the reaction HI(aq) + MeOAc --> Mel + HOAc. This moderates the concentration of HI(aq) and so facilitates catalytic turnover via neutral 4.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据