4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Continuous regeneration of degreasing solutions from electroplating operations using a membrane bioreactor

期刊

DESALINATION
卷 162, 期 1-3, 页码 315-326

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0011-9164(04)00065-7

关键词

electroplating industry; degreasing; regeneration of degreasing solutions; membrane bioreactor

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To extend the service life and to improve the quality of degreasing solutions from surface refining processes in the metal working industry a process based on a membrane bioreactor (MBR) with submerged multi-channel flat sheet ceramic membranes was developed. This MBR-based regeneration process combines the retention by membranes and the biodegradation of oils/grease. The objective is to retain the biomass as well as the hydrocarbons in the bioreactor by the microfiltration membranes to enhance biodegradation. Simultaneously, low retention is aimed at for the surfactants since these substances have to be returned to the degreasing bath. The process was tested with a mobile pilot plant over a three-month period on site in an enterprise which carries out electroplating on commission. The multi-channel flat sheet ceramic membranes, which had an average pore diameter of 0.3 mum, fulfilled the objective of retaining the hydrocarbons to a high extent while allowing relatively high permeation of the surfactants (in order to minimise additional dosing). Permeate was free of solid matter and hydrocarbon concentration was reduced by 85-90% (compared to the feed). The reduction in non-ionic surfactants was only 25-40%. Compared to conventional (open) biological regeneration, a five fold increase in volumetric biodegradation rate was achieved due to the higher biomass concentration. A preliminary economic analysis for this case study showed, that there was a reduction in costs of roughly one third for the process under study in contrast to conventional hot alkaline degreasing. The main reason for this saving is the lower cost of wastewater treatment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据