4.6 Article

The C-terminal sequence of LMADS1 is essential for the formation of homodimers for B function proteins

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 279, 期 11, 页码 10747-10755

出版社

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M311646200

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

LMADS1, a lily ( Lilium longiflorum) AP3 orthologue, contains the complete consensus sequence of the paleoAP3 ( YGSHDLRLA) and PI-derived (YEFRVQPSQPNLH) motifs in the C-terminal region of the protein. Interestingly, through yeast two-hybrid analysis, LMADS1 was found to be capable of forming homodimers. These results indicated that LMADS1 represents an ancestral form of the B function protein, which retains the ability to form homodimers in regulating petal and stamen development in lily. To explore the involvement of the conserved motifs in the C-terminal region of LMADS1 in forming homodimers, truncated forms of LMADS1 were generated, and their ability to form homodimers was analyzed using yeast two-hybrid and electrophoretic mobility shift assay. The ability of LMADS1 to form homodimers decreased once the C-terminal paleoAP3 motif was deleted. When both paleoAP3 and PI-derived motifs were deleted, the ability of LMADS1 to form homodimers was completely abolished. This result indicated that although the paleoAP3 motif promotes the formation of LMADS1 homodimers, the PI-derived motif is essential. Deletion analysis indicated that two amino acids, RV, of the 5 final amino acids, YEFRV, in the PI-derived motif are essential for the formation of homodimers. Further, point mutation analysis indicated that amino acid Val was absolutely necessary, whereas residue Arg played a less important role in the formation of homodimers. Furthermore, Arabidopsis AP3 was able to form homodimers once its C-terminal region was replaced by that of LMADS1. This result indicated that the C-terminal region of LMADS1 is responsible and essential for homodimer formation of the ancestral form of the B function protein.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据