4.6 Article

Expansion and functional relevance of high-avidity myelin-specific CD4+ T cells in multiple sclerosis

期刊

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
卷 172, 期 6, 页码 3893-3904

出版社

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.172.6.3893

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an autoimmune disease in which myelin-specific T cells are believed to play a crucial pathogenic role. Nevertheless, so far it has been extremely difficult to demonstrate differences in T cell reactivity to myelin Ag between MS patients and controls. We believe that by using unphysiologically high Ag concentrations previous studies have missed a highly relevant aspect of autoimmune responses, i.e., T cells recognizing Ag with high functional avidity. Therefore, we focused on the characterization of high-avidity myelin-specific CD4(+) T cells in a large cohort of MS patients and controls that was matched demographically and with respect to expression of MHC class II alleles. We demonstrated that their frequency is significantly higher in MS patients while the numbers of control T cells specific for influenza hemagglutinin are virtually identical between the two cohorts; that high-avidity T cells are enriched for previously in vivo-activated cells and are significantly skewed toward a proinflammatory phenotype. Moreover, the immunodominant epitopes that were most discriminatory between MS patients and controls differed from those described previously and were clearly biased toward epitopes with lower predicted binding affinities to HLA-DR molecules, pointing at the importance of thymic selection for the generation of the autoimmune T cell repertoire. Correlations between selected immunological parameters and magnetic resonance imaging markers indicate that the specificity and function of these cells influences phenotypic disease expression. These data have important implications for autoimmunity research and should be considered in the development of Ag-specific therapies in MS.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据