4.7 Article

A randomized clinical trial of energy conservation for patients with cancer-related fatigue

期刊

CANCER
卷 100, 期 6, 页码 1302-1310

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.20111

关键词

fatigue; symptom management; quality of life; symptom clusters

类别

资金

  1. NINR NIH HHS [R01NR04573] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND. The efficacy of energy conservation and activity management (ECAM) for fatigue reduction and maintenance of functional performance has never been evaluated in adults with cancer who are undergoing treatment. METHODS. A randomized clinical trial compared an ECAM intervention with a control intervention focused on nutrition. Individuals initiating chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or concurrent therapy for cancer were randomized to receive either the semistructured ECAM intervention (n = 200) or the control intervention (n = 196). Participants in each group participated in 3 telephone sessions with an oncology nurse during the first 5 weeks of treatment. Data on fatigue and limitation of functioning were obtained before cancer treatment and at two follow-up points that coincided with times of high fatigue for each type of treatment. The outcomes of interest included perception of fatigue and functional performance. RESULTS. A repeated-measures analysis of covariance using the type of cancer treatment as a covariate revealed a significant study group-by-time interaction indicating that the ECAM group experienced a greater decrease in fatigue over time compared with the control group (F-2,F-544 = 4.5; P = 0.01). The intervention was not associated with changes in overall functional performance. CONCLUSIONS. individuals who received the ECAM intervention derived a modest but significant benefit from it. To achieve a more robust clinical benefit from the intervention, it may be necessary to manage other key symptoms in addition to fatigue. Research is needed to examine symptom clusters or combinations associated with negative outcomes as well as combination strategies for symptom management. (C) 2004 American Cancer Society.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据