4.7 Article

A novel human cancer vaccine elicits cellular responses to the tumor-associated antigen, human chorionic gonadotropin β

期刊

CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH
卷 10, 期 6, 页码 1920-1927

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-03-0264

关键词

-

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: The oncofetal antigen, human chorionic gonadotropin beta subunit (hCGbeta), is expressed by a number of carcinomas and is a prognostic indicator in renal, colorectal, bladder, and pancreatic cancers. We describe the development of a novel antibody-based dendritic cell (DC)-targeted cancer vaccine capable of eliciting cellular immune responses directed against hCGbeta. Experimental Design: The tumor-associated antigen hCGbeta was coupled genetically to a human anti-DC antibody (B11). The resulting fusion protein (B11-hCGbeta) was evaluated for its ability to promote tumor antigen-specific cellular immune responses in a human in vitro model. Monocyte-derived human DCs from normal donors were exposed to purified B11-hCGbeta, activated with CD40 ligand, mixed with autologous lymphocytes, and tested for their ability to promote hCGbeta-specific proliferative and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte responses. Results: B11-hCGbeta was found to be a soluble, well-defined, and readily purified product that specifically recognized the human mannose receptor via the B11 antibody portion of the fusion protein. B11-hCGbeta functionally promoted the uptake and processing of tumor antigen by DCs, which led to the generation of tumor-specific HLA class I and class II-restricted T-cell responses, including CTLs capable of killing human cancer cell lines expressing hCGbeta. Conclusions: Although other hCG vaccines have been shown to be capable of eliciting antibody responses to hCGbeta, this is the first time that cellular immune responses to hCGbeta have been induced by a vaccine in a human system. This DC-targeted hCGbeta vaccine holds promise for the management of a number of cancers and merits additional clinical development.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据