4.7 Article

Mediation of annexin 1 secretion by a probenecid-sensitive ABC-transporter in rat inflamed mucosa

期刊

BIOCHEMICAL PHARMACOLOGY
卷 67, 期 6, 页码 1195-1202

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.bcp.2003.11.015

关键词

annexin 1; inflammation; rectocolitis; rat; secretion; ABC-transporter

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Annexin 1 is secreted by mammalian cells but lacks a leader signal sequence necessary to lead it to the classical secretory pathway via the endoplasmic reticulum. The mechanisms involved in the secretion of leaderless proteins remain uncertain. It has been suggested to involve membrane translocation via an ABC-transporter (ATP binding cassette). Using cultured inflamed mucosa from rectocolitis induced in rats, we studied if annexin 1 secretion followed the two main characteristics of ABC-transporter substrates: dependency on ATP hydrolysis and competitive inhibition by several other ABC-transporter substrates. Annexin I secretion is inhibited in a dose-dependent manner by two ATPase inhibitors. The inhibition reached 63.2 +/- 3.2%, 66.1 +/- 3.73% and 88.6 +/- 1.4% in the presence of 2 mM vanadate, 0.5 and 1 mM pervanadate, respectively. The efflux of calcein, a known ABC-transporter substrate, is similarly inhibited by 69.4 +/- 2.8% in the presence of I mM pervanadate. Probenecid, an inhibitor of several ABC-transporters of the subfamilly ABCC or MRP (multidrug resistant associated protein), also inhibited annexin I secretion in a dose-dependent manner. As compared to control, 10 mM probenecid reduced annexin I secretion by 72 +/- 20% and 20 mM by 95.0 +/- 9%. By contrast, annexin 1 secretion is not blocked by other inhibitors of MRP1 (indomethacin, MK571), MRP2 (ochratoxin A1 or MK571), MRP5 (trequinsin or sulfinpyrazone) or by verapamil, cyclosporin A or glyburide. Taken together, our results show that annexin 1 secretion appears to share the efflux properties of ABC-transporter substrates. (C) 2003 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据