4.7 Article

Day-hospital treatment of acute pericarditis - A management program for outpatient therapy

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY
卷 43, 期 6, 页码 1042-1046

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2003.09.055

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVES We sought to investigate the safety and efficacy of a protocol for acute pericarditis triage and Outpatient management of low-risk cases. BACKGROUND Acute pericarditis has generally a brief and benign course after empiric treatment by non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and routine hospitalization of most patients may be unnecessary. METHODS From January 1996 to December 2001, all consecutive cases of acute pericarditis were evaluated on a day-hospital basis. Patients without clinical poor prognostic predictors (fever >38degreesC, subacute onset, immunodepression, trauma, oral anticoagulant therapy, myopericarditis, severe pericardial effusion, cardiac tamponade) were considered low-risk cases and assigned to outpatient treatment with high-dose oral aspirin. Patients with poor prognostic predictors or aspirin failure were hospitalized for etiology search and treatment. A clinical and echocardiographic follow-up was performed at 48 to 72 h, 7 to 10 days, 1 month, 6 months, and 1 year. RESULTS Two hundred fifty-four out of 300 (84.7%) patients were selected as low-risk cases. Outpatient treatment was efficacious in 221 out of 254 (87%) cases. Thirty-three out of 254 patients were hospitalized because of aspirin failure. Patients treated on an out-of-hospital basis had no serious complications after a mean follow-up of 38 months (no cases of cardiac tamponade). A higher frequency of recurrences and constriction was recorded in aspirin-resistant cases than in aspirin responders (60.6% vs. 10.4% for recurrences and 9.1% vs. 0.5% for constriction, respectively; all p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS A protocol for acute pericarditis triage and outpatient therapy of low-risk cases is safe and efficacious and may reduce management costs. (C) 2004 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据