4.4 Article

Potent lipid peroxidation inhibitors from Withania somnifera fruits

期刊

TETRAHEDRON
卷 60, 期 13, 页码 3109-3121

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.tet.2004.01.016

关键词

Withania somnifera; withanamide; lipid peroxidation; antioxidant

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A bioassay-guided purification of the methanolic extract of Withania somnifera fruits yielded novel withanamides A-I (1-9) and withanolides (10-13). Among the withanolides, compound 10 is novel. The structures of these compounds were determined by using FABMS, HRFABMS, 1D and 2D NMR spectral and chemical methods. The withanamides possess novel chemical structures and consisted of serotonin, glucose and long-chain hydroxyl fatty acid moieties. The stereochemistry of the hydroxyl group in the long-chain fatty acid moiety in compound I was determined by the modified Mosher's ester method. Compounds 1-13 were tested for their ability to inhibit lipid peroxidation in a model system using large unilamellar vesicles. Withanamides 1-5 and 9 inhibited lipid peroxidation by 98, 93, 79, 94, 81 and 86%, respectively, at 1 mug/mL. However, compounds 6-8 inhibited the lipid peroxidation by 85, 82 and 90%, respectively, at 0.5 mug/mL. Withanolides 10-13 were also tested and only compound 12 inhibited the lipid peroxidation by 82% at 10 mug/mL. To evaluate the structure activity relationships of withanamides A-I, compounds 14-16 were purchased and their lipid peroxidation activity determined as in the case of compounds 1-9. Commercial antioxidants, butylated hydroxyanisole (BHA), butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT) and tertbutylhydroquinone (TBHQ), were also tested in this assay at 1 mug/mL and showed 80, 81 and 85% of inhibition, respectively. Our results suggest that the potent antioxidant activity exhibited by novel withanamides is probably due to the hydroxylated long-chain acyl group. This is the first report of withanamides, unique serotonin conjugates, from W. somnifera fruits. (C) 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据