4.6 Article

Protons activate the δ-subunit of the epithelial Na+ channel in humans

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 279, 期 13, 页码 12529-12534

出版社

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M400274200

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The amiloride-sensitive epithelial Na+ channel (ENaC) controls Na+ transport into cells and across epithelia. So far, four homologous subunits of mammalian ENaC have been isolated and are denoted as alpha, beta, gamma, and delta. ENaCdelta can associate with beta and gamma subunits and generate a constitutive current that is 2 orders of magnitude larger than that of homomeric ENaCdelta. However, the distribution pattern of ENaCdelta is not consistent with that of the beta and gamma subunits. ENaCdelta is expressed mainly in the brain in contrast to beta and gamma subunits, which are expressed in non-neuronal tissues. To explain this discrepancy, we searched for novel functional properties of homomeric ENaCdelta and investigated the detailed tissue distribution in humans. When human ENaCdelta was expressed in Xenopus oocytes and Chinese hamster ovary cells, a reduction of extracellular pH activated this channel (half-maximal pH for an activation of 5.0), and the acid-induced current was abolished by amiloride. The most striking finding was that the desensitization of the acid-evoked current was much slower ( by similar to 10% 120 s later), dissociating from the kinetics of acid-sensing ion channels in the degenerin/epithelial Na+ channel family, which were rapidly desensitized during acidification. RNA dot-blot analyses showed that ENaCdelta mRNA was widely distributed throughout the brain and was also expressed in the heart, kidney, and pancreas in humans. Northern blotting confirmed that ENaCdelta was expressed in the cerebellum and the hippocampus. In conclusion, human ENaCdelta activity is regulated by protons, indicating that it may contribute to the pH sensation and/or pH regulation in the human brain.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据