4.4 Review

Opposing organizing forces of deposit-feeding marine communities

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jembe.2003.12.008

关键词

community ecology; deposit feeding; spatial variation; detritus; field experiments; soft sediments; trophic ecology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We contend that a range of phenomena characterizing temperate deposit-feeding communities in low-energy environments is strongly organized by two principal opposing forces: (1) spatially localized inputs of detritus or new recruits, leading to a mosaic of initial patches, with subsequent impacts on spatio-temporal variation of species with limited mobility; and (2) the impact of mobile consumers, which move to spatially localized resources and thereby exert major controls over comparatively larger spatial scales. Surface deposit feeders react differently from deep feeders, in terms of spatio-temporal population change. The two opposing community control forces, combined with responses of deposit feeder functional groups, have potentially different effects on community structure. Mobile consumers, often acting as keystone species, may move to localized patches created by the bottom-up force of food input or by localized recruitment of prey. Their mobility, combined with predicted optimal foraging behavior, would usually produce a spatially homogenizing force, leading to reduced spatial variation in community composition. By contrast, spatially localized inputs of resources, if dominant, would always lead to strong spatial heterogeneity. Dominance of complex space-time variation in detrital enrichment would lead to strong spatio-temporal complexity in macrofauna if the response of recruiting larvae and rapidly growing small invertebrate populations was immediate and keyed to localized food input. The ability of mobile consumers to locate detritus, combined with the spatial distribution and overall input rate of detritus, should determine the balance of surface and deep-feeding deposit feeders. The opposing force approach can be applied to communities generally. (C) 2004 Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据