4.8 Article

Loss of imprinting of insulin growth factor II gene: A potential heritable biomarker for colon neoplasia predisposition

期刊

GASTROENTEROLOGY
卷 126, 期 4, 页码 964-970

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2003.12.051

关键词

-

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [R01 CA65145, P50 CA-62924-10] Funding Source: Medline
  2. PHS HHS [K07 CWA092445] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background & Aims: Loss of genomic imprinting (LOI) of insulin-like growth factor II gene (IGF2) involves abnormal activation of the normally silent maternally inherited allele. LOI of IGF2 has been associated with personal and family history of colorectal neoplasia (CRN), supporting a role for LOI in colorectal carcinogenesis. Whether LOI of IGF2 is associated with known environmental risk factors for CRN is unknown. Methods: We performed quantitative hot-stop PCR for imprinting analysis of IGF2 on normal peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBL) of individuals. Environmental exposures including tobacco, alcohol, NSAIDs, and nutrient consumption (calcium, folate, selenium, fiber, and fat) were correlated with LOI expression in PBL. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% CI were calculated. Results: The prevalence of LOI of IGF2 was examined in 172 individuals. Persons with CRN (adenomas/cancer) had 5.1-fold (95% CI: 1.9213.6) increased risk of having LOI of IGF2 in PBL compared with those without CRN. In contrast, tobacco smoking (OR 0.96, 95% CI: 0.36-2.55), alcohol consumption (OR = 1.22, 95% CI: 0.45-3.3), and NSAIDs use (OR = 121, 95% CI: 0.38-3.94) were not significantly associated with LOI of IGF2. Nutrient ingestion including calcium (P = 0.61), folate (P = 0.23), selenium (P = 0.19), fiber (P = 0.63), and fat (P = 0.14) was not statistically correlated with LOI of IGF2. Conclusions: Abnormal imprinting of lGF2 gene was strongly associated with CRN but not with any of the environmental exposures examined. LOI of lGF2 does not appear to be an environmentally acquired phenomenon but rather a hereditary risk factor for CRN.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据