4.6 Article

Atypical anti inflammatory activation of microglia induced by apoptotic neurons - Possible role of phosphatidylserine-phosphatidylserine receptor interaction

期刊

MOLECULAR NEUROBIOLOGY
卷 29, 期 2, 页码 197-212

出版社

HUMANA PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1385/MN:29:2:197

关键词

apoptosis; brain macrophages; cytokine; inflammation; nerve growth factor; neurodegeneration; nitric oxide; microglial activation; prostaglandin E-2; transforming growth factor-beta

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the central nervous system (CNS), apoptosis plays an important role during development and is a primary pathogenic mechanism in several adult neurodegenerative diseases. A main feature of apoptotic cell death is the efficient and fast removal of dying cells by macrophages and nonprofessional phagocytes, without eliciting inflammation in the surrounding tissue. Apoptotic cells undergo several membrane changes, including the externalization of so-called eat me signals whose cognate receptors are present on professional phagocytes. Among these signals, the aminophospholipid phosphatidylserine (PS) appears to have a crucial and unique role in preventing the classical pro-inflammatory activation of macrophages, thus ensuring the silent and safe removal of apoptotic cells. Although extensively studied in the peripheral organs, the process of recognition and removal of apoptotic cells in the brain has only recently begun to be unraveled. Here, we summarize the evidence suggesting that upon interaction with PS-expressing apoptotic neurons, microglia may no longer promote the inflammatory cascade, but rather facilitate the elimination of damaged neurons through antiinflammatory and neuroprotective functions. We propose that the anti-inflammatory microglial phenotype induced through the activation of the specific PS receptor (PtdSerR), expressed by resting and activated microglial cells, could be relevant to the final outcome of neurodegenerative diseases, in which apoptosis seems to play a crucial role.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据