4.6 Article

Effect of acute and chronic ascorbic acid on flow-mediated dilatation with sedentary and physically active human ageing

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON
卷 556, 期 1, 页码 315-324

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2003.057042

关键词

-

资金

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [RR00051, M01 RR000051] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIA NIH HHS [AG13038, AG19365, R01 AG013038, AG06537, R01 AG006537, AG00828, R37 AG013038] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Peripheral conduit artery flow-mediated dilatation decreases with ageing in humans. The underlying mechanisms and efficacy of preventive strategies are unknown. Brachial artery flow-mediated dilatation was determined at baseline and after ascorbic acid (vitamin C) intravenous infusion and chronic supplementation (500 mg day(-1) for 30 days) in three groups of healthy men: young sedentary (n = 11; 25 +/- 1 years, mean +/- S.E.M.), older sedentary (n = 9; 64 +/- 2), and older endurance-exercise trained (n = 9; 64 +/- 2). At baseline, flow-mediated dilatation (normalized for the hyperaemic stimulus) was similar to45% lower in the older (0.015 +/- 0.001) versus young (0.028 +/- 0.004) sedentary men (P < 0.01), but was preserved in older exercising men (0.028 +/- 0.004). Ascorbic acid infusion increased plasma concentrations > 15-fold in all groups and restored flow-mediated dilatation in the sedentary older men (to 0.023 +/- 0.002; P > 0.1 versus other groups), with no effects in the other two groups. Oral ascorbic acid supplementation did not affect flow-mediated dilatation in any group. Brachial artery endothelium-independent dilatation (sublingual nitroglycerin) did not differ among the groups at baseline nor change with ascorbic acid administration. These results provide the first evidence for an important role of oxidative stress in both the impairment in peripheral conduit artery flow-mediated dilatation with sedentary human ageing and the preservation of flow-mediated dilatation with physically active ageing.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据