4.3 Article

Prognostic value of 1p, 19q, 9p, 10q, and EGFR-FISH analyses in recurrent oligodendrogliomas

期刊

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/jnen/63.4.314

关键词

fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH); gene amplification; gene deletion; oligodendroglioma; recurrence; survival; tumor genetics

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [P50 CA97247] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Although 1p/19q codetetions define genetically favorable oligodendrogliornas, eventual tumor progression and patient death remain constant. Genetic testing is often performed at the time of recurrence, though it is unclear whether these or other genetic alterations provide useful prognostic information. We characterized 138 of 189 (73%) available primary and recurrent oligodendroglial neoplasms from 80 patients, utilizing paired FISH probes for 1p32/1q42,]19p13/19q13, CEP7/ EGFR, CEP9/p 16, and PTEN/DMBT1. Patients were followed until death (49%), or a median follow-up of 8.9 years. Patients with 1p/19q codeleted tumors (71%) had an estimated overall median survival of 14.9 years with an estimated 3.9 years from first recurrence. In contrast, those lacking deletions had significantly lower estimated overall median survivals of 4.7 years and 1.0 year after first recurrence (both p < 0.001). This increased survival in patients with 1p/19q codeleted tumors remained significant when adjustments were made for age, tumor grade, type of surgical procedure, and treatment with radiation or chemotherapy. Only I recurrence showed focal EGFR amplification, while 5 developed 10q deletions, mostly in high-grade mixed oligoastrocytomas lacking 1p/19q deletions. In contrast, p16 (9p21) deletions were common and associated with both high grade (p < 0.001) and recurrence (p = 0.002). Our data suggest that in classic oligodendrogliomas: 1) 1p/19q tumor status is a powerful predictor of patient survival, even after recurrence; 2) p16 deletions are common progression-associated alterations; and 3) 10q deletions and EGFR amplifications are sufficiently rare to suggest the possibility of alternate diagnoses.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据