4.4 Article

Effect of Fenofibrate-mediated increase in plasma homocysteine on the progression of coronary artery disease in type 2 diabetes Mellitus

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY
卷 93, 期 7, 页码 848-853

出版社

EXCERPTA MEDICA INC-ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2003.12.022

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Diabetes Atherosclerosis Intervention Study (DAIS) examined the effects of fenofibrate or placebo on the progression of coronary artery disease (CAD) in 418 type 2 diabetic subjects with dyslipidemia. Fenofibrate use was associated with a 6% increase in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, a 28% decrease in triglycerides, a 5% decrease in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and a 55% increase in plasma homocysteine (tHcy). The purpose of the present study was to determine whether this increase in tHcy in the fenofibrate group was associated with CAD progression or with clinical events. The increase in tHcy with fenofibrate (n = 207) was not related to changes in factors known to modulate tHcy levels (serum levels of Vitamin B-12, folate, or renal function). CAD was quantified by angiography at baseline and after a minimum of 3 years of therapy with fenofibrate or placebo. The primary end point was change in mean segment diameter (MSD), minimal lumen diameter, and percent stenosis. Baseline tHcy level was correlated with percent diameter stenosis (r = 0.111, p = 0.028). Baseline, but not end-of-study elevated tHcy levels, decreased the beneficial effect of fenofibrate. Unexpectedly, the final tHcy levels correlated negatively with CAD progression (r = -0.111, p = .0.031) in the overall group. In the fenofibrate group, there was no significant correlation between tHcy and minimal lumen diameter (r = -0.135, p = 0.069), or percent stenosis. An increase in tHcy levels was not correlated with adverse clinical events in the fenofibrate group. This analysis of the the DAIS reveals that the fenofibrate-mediated increase in tHcy levels does not attenuate the beneficial effects of fenofibrate on CAD progression or clinical events. (C) 2004 by Excerpta Medica, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据