4.7 Article

Men's use of positive strategies for preventing and managing depression: A qualitative investigation

期刊

JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS
卷 188, 期 -, 页码 179-187

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2015.08.070

关键词

Men; Depression; Coping strategies; Prevention; Management

资金

  1. beyondblue, Australia [SBcb6725]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: One in eight men experience depression and men account for 75% of suicides. Previous research has focused on men's reluctance to seek help and use of unhelpful coping strategies. Method: Thematic analysis was used on transcripts from 21 focus groups and 24 in-depth interviews focused on positive strategies men use to prevent and manage depression. Results: In total, 168 men were recruited and the majority (63%) reported no current depression. Four major themes were identified, where men: (1) used a broad variety of positive strategies and made clear distinctions between prevention and management, (2) used strategies that were typically masculine, as well as challenged expectations of manliness, (3) felt powerless in the face of suicide, and (4) had accumulated wisdom they felt was beneficial for others. Men specifically advised others to talk about problems. Prevention relied upon regular routines for balance, while management relied upon having a plan. Limitations: The majority of the men were aged over 55 years and highly educated. Younger men or those without tertiary education may favour different strategies. Conclusions: In contrast to using only unhelpful strategies, the men used a broad range of positive strategies and adapted their use depending on mood, symptom or problem severity. Use of positive strategies was sophisticated, nuanced, and often underlined by a guiding philosophy. Rather than simply reacting to problems, men actively engaged in preventing the development of depressed moods, and made conscious choices about when or how to take action. Clinical and public health implications are discussed. (c) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved,

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据