3.8 Article

Early individualized postoperative occupational therapy training in 100 patients improves ADL after hip fracture - A randomized trial

期刊

ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA SCANDINAVICA
卷 75, 期 2, 页码 177-183

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS AS
DOI: 10.1080/00016470412331294435

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background It is not clear whether occupational therapy is of value for hip fracture patients. Patients and methods In a randomized trial we studied the effects of an early, individualized, postoperative occupational training (OT) program on the ability of hip fracture patients to perform ADL and IADL. Secondary endpoints were self-reported fear of pain and pain when performing ADL and IADL. The need for technical aids and/or home adaptations was also investigated. 100 eligible patients (aged greater than or equal to65 years, with independent residence) were randomized 50:50 to an OT or control group (conventional care). During their hospital stay, members of the OT group received individual daily training which included the use of technical aids. Before discharge, the occupational therapist paid a home visit together with the patient. All patients were assessed 2-4 days after surgery, at discharge and after 2 months, using the Klein-Bell ADL scale and a modified version of the Disability Rating Index. Results At discharge, the OT group had better ability to dress, to take care of personal hygiene and bathing activities independently, and to make toilet visits. Age, sex, type of fracture or length of stay at the hospital made no significant contribution to explaining the better ADL ability on discharge. After 2 months, all patients had regained their ADL and IADL abilities. Half of the patients required technical aids and adaptations in their homes. Interpretation Individualized OT-training speed up the ability of patients to perform ADL, thus enhancing the likelihood of patients returning to independent living and reducing the need for postoperative care at home.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据