4.7 Article

Association of COMT and TPH-2 genes with DSM-5 based PTSD symptoms

期刊

JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS
卷 172, 期 -, 页码 472-478

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2014.10.034

关键词

Catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT); Genetics; PTSU; Tryptophan hydroxylase 2 (TPH 2); Trauma

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Dopaminergic and serotonergic systems have been implicated in PTSD. The present study evaluated the association of four catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) gene loci, and the joint effect of COMT and tryptophan hydroxylase 2 (TPH2) genes on PTSD symptoms. Methods: Subjects included 200 Caucasian Armenian adults exposed to the 1988 Spitak earthquake from 12 multigenerational (3-5 generations) families. instruments used included the UCLA PTSD Reaction Index based on DSM-5 criteria, and the Beck Depression Inventory, Results: The adjusted heritabilitiy of vulnerability to DSM-5 based PTSD symptoms was 0.60 (p < 10(-4)). There was a significant association of the COMT allele rs4633C with total PTSD (p < 003), and D category (p < 0.04) (negative alterations in cognitions and mood) severity scores, but not with C category (avoidance) scores. There was no genetic correlation between C and D category severity scores. COMT allele rs4633C and the TPH-2 allele rs11178997T together accounted for 7% of the variance in PTSD severity scores (p < 0.001). None of the COMT alleles were associated with depression. Limitations: The ratings of earthquake exposure and prior trauma may have been subject to recall bias. The findings may not be generalizable to other ethnic/racial populations. Conclusion: COMT allele rs4633C may be causally related and/or is in linkage disequiibrium with gene(s) that are causally related to PTSD symptoms. Carriers of these COMT and the TPH-2 alleles may be at increased risk for PTSD. The findings provide biological support for dividing DSM-lV category C symptoms into DSM-5 categories C and D. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据