4.7 Article

Effects of sodium tetraborate and boric acid on nonisothermal mannitol crystallization in frozen solutions and freeze-dried solids

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICS
卷 273, 期 1-2, 页码 85-93

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2003.12.024

关键词

freeze-drying; crystallization; DSC; amorphous; complexation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The purpose of the present study was to elucidate the effects of sodium tetraborate (borax) and boric acid on the crystallization of mannitol in frozen aqueous solutions and freeze-dried solids. Thermal analysis of frozen solutions showed that sodium tetraborate inhibits mannitol crystallization at sodium tetraborate/mannitol molar concentration ratios of approximately 0.0.5, which is much lower than the other co-solutes studied (boric acid, sucrose, sodium phosphate buffer). Inhibition of the mannitol crystallization in frozen solutions resulted in highly amorphous mannitol in the freeze-dried solids. Mannitol remained in an amorphous state in some of the combination freeze-dried solids, even at elevated temperatures. Changes in the thermal transition temperatures (glass transition temperature of maximally freeze-concentrated solute (Tg) and glass transition temperature of freeze-dried solid (Tg)) suggested reduced mannitol molecular mobility with increases in the sodium tetraborate ratio. Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR) analysis of the bovine serum albumin secondary structure showed apparent protein structure-stabilizing effects of the amorphous mannitol and sodium tetraborate combination during the freeze-drying process. The mannitol and sodium tetraborate combination also protected lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) from inactivation during freeze-drying. We conclude that the complex formation and the accompanying reduction in molecular mobility make sodium tetraborate an effective mannitol crystallization inhibitor in frozen solutions and freeze-dried solids. (C) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据