4.8 Article

The persistance and removal of enteric pathogens in constructed wetlands

期刊

WATER RESEARCH
卷 38, 期 7, 页码 1831-1837

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2003.12.029

关键词

constructed wetland; fecal coliforms; S. typhimurium; Giardia; Crymosporidium; PRD-1

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sedimentation is thought to be one of the mechanisms of microbial reduction from wetlands used for wastewater treatment. This study compared the occurrence and survival of enteric indicator microorganisms and pathogens in the water column and sediments of two constructed surface flow wetlands in Arizona. On a volume/wet weight basis the concentration of fecal coliforms and coliphage in the water column and sediment was similar. However, on a volume/ dry weight basis the numbers were one to two orders of magnitude higher in the sediment. Giardia cyst and Cryptosporidium oocyst concentrations were one to three orders of magnitude greater in the sediment compared to the water column. The die-off rates of all the bacteria and coliphage were greater in the water column than the sediment. The die-off rates of fecal coliforms in the water and sediment were 0.256 log(10)day(-1) and 0.151 log(10)day(-1), respectively. The die-off rates of Salmonella typhimurium in the water and sediment were 0.345log(10)day(-1) and 0.312log(10)day(-1) , respectively. The die-off rates of naturally occurring coliphage in water column and sediment were 0.397 log(10) day(-1) and 0.107 log(10)day(-1), respectively, and the die-off rates of and PRD-1 in water and sediment were 0.198 log10 day(-1) and 0.054 log(10)day(-1), respectively. In contrast Giardia die-off in the sediment was greater compared to the water column. The die-off rates of Giardia in water and sediment were 0.029 log(10)day(-1) and 0.37 log(10)day(-1), respectively. Coliphage survived the longest of any group of organisms in the sediment and the least in the water column. In contrast Giardia survived best in the water column and least in the sediment. (C) 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据